Each system supported adds tests, customer support, etc. At its core, it’s a cost benefit analysis. Bringing it and the cost of the machine up again isn’t going to change this. You say you understand, but I already said it has nothing to do with power and explained why. > Yes I understand what you are saying, but there is no need for it, Operating systems didn't require suddenly more powerful computers, years ago it made sense because the machine just couldn't handle it, but today my machine handles everything just fine and is higher spec than machines Apple has determined can run it. > It's a computer I paid over £3,000 for, that got cut off 7 years after release for no valid reason as a customer. The level of work required from a community project is magnitudes smaller than from the company. Both in functionality (this thread is full of people talking about small issues popping up more and more frequently, especially in the latest OS versions which actually have specific requirements like AVX2) and in terms of actual support. Hacks are in no way shape or form equivalent to official support. > You make it sound like it's some crazy high cost for Apple to do this, yet this small open source project seems to be able to do it and for them it would be much more difficult. macOS on Intel is dying, but if you have a pre-T2 Mac, you might be surprised by how well Linux might work on it. ![]() While I was not happy with these issues on macOS, it was still amazing to see how this group of volunteers enabled newer macOS releases on my device. There is also less swapping, and while not perfect, it feels more reliable than Ventura or Monterey. The battery life is at least equal, it boots faster, and the OS does not immdiately use half of my 8 GiB RAM for itself. This old Mac now runs Ubuntu LTS without any issues. The macOS 13.3 update also broke my GPU driver again for a few weeks, and I finally gave up on it. Still, the OS now feels unreliable, and while I did not see hard crashes or errors, subtile breakage only disappeared, when I rebooted the system every few hours. The OS now relies on AVX2 binaries, and the OCLP devs made some magic hacks to circumvent that requirement. I think macOS Ventura is the end of the road for macOS on my Mac. These root patches caused some weird issues with 3D acceleration in certain apps, and driver-related regressions introducted by some later Catalina patches took longer to be fixed in OCLP than in the still supported Catalina release. I wouldn't be surprised if the higher end M1 Macs still be perfectly usable around the time when the 2k38 bug will wreak havoc across the world.Ĭatalina was the last supported OS for my 2012 MBA, and the following Big Sur upgrade worked well with OCLP because it only had to patch in WiFi support during the boot process.Īfter that, macOS Monterey also dropped support for my Ivy Bridge GPU, and OCLP had to rely on persistent patches to my system volume to enable 3D acceleration again. The same is true for many smartphones all the modern advancements are nice to haves, very different from the turbulent smartphone era around the late 00s.Īpple needs to sell hardware to make the money needed to fund development but they exclusively focus on very expensive high-end devices, which naturally have a very long life span if it weren't for the software. With how much performance you can get out of an older laptop that cost a third of a Mac from the same era by installing an OS like Linux, it's a shame that Apple is abandoning these devices. ![]() There are some specific Mac downsides for using older models (the insufficient cooling solution in some laptop models, for example) that will impact long term usability, but the hardware still has a ways to go. ![]() All you need is a RAM upgrade and an SSD! A CPU that's over ten years old will still perform fine for light desktop use, because that's honestly all you need in most cases. Things have changed the past few years but for a while upgrades to CPU performance weren't that meaningful between generations. Of course there aren't technical limitations for any but the lowest specced Macs. ![]() Supporting old hardware costs money because you need to write more tests.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |